Very
simply, any pedagogical model applied to learning science should:
- Be easy to learn. It should
require the least possible student effort, provide the greatest possible
accuracy of student reproduction, and ensure the smallest possible set of
structural student errors.
- Accommodate a wide variety
of students. The
ability, age, previous achievement and future learning of high school students
spans a spectrum as wide as humanity itself. A pedagogical model should be
within the intellectual grasp of most students within this spectrum. It should
also enable those students to make progress, no matter where they begin on the
spectrum.
- Be scientifically
tenable. At the
very least, it should have fewer errors than the B-R and Lewis models. It
should match the largest possible set of explanations and predictions of more
advanced theories. It should contradict more advanced models only at the very
extremities of its application, and certainly not at its core.
- Advance every
student’s capacity to explore. No matter where they begin on the spectrum, all students are driven to
explore by their innate curiosity. A pedagogical model of the atom should
enable students to explore their own questions about chemical behaviour.
- Advance students’
understanding of science. The epistemology of science is not easy to convey to novices. Naïve
approaches to “methods of science” distort the scientific enterprise, and
alienate many students from the study of science. A pedagogical model would
invite students to participate in scientific investigation, and reward them
with honest findings.
- Invite students to create knowledge. The scientific enterprise is about creating and verifying new knowledge. How can we initiate students into this epistemic activity? Memorizing dead science has not worked. “Discovery” science has not worked. A pedagogical model of the atom would support students as they create and express their own new knowledge of chemical behaviour.
Scientists use models to do scientists' work. Teachers need models to do teachers' work.
No comments:
Post a Comment